SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5329

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BUBU @ DEBI PRASAD JENA @ DEVI PRASAD JENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL 11482 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.11482 of 2025 Bubu @ Debi Prasad Jena @ Petitioner Devi Prasad Jena Mr. G. Das, Advocate -versus-

State of Odisha and another Opposite Parties Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP Mr. S.R. Panda, Advocate (Informant)

CORAM:

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER(ORAL)

24.12.2025 Order No

03. I.A. No.1168 of 2025

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is an application by the petitioner for grant of interim bail for his self-treatment.

3. Heard, Mr. Gorekhanath Das, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Sandeep Raj Panda, learned counsel, who enters appearance for the informant in the Court today by filing Vakalatnama, which is taken on record and Mr. R.B. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record 4. After having considered the rival submissions and on going through the averments taken in the IA the petitioner is suffering from some kind of ailment and there is requirement for his treatment outside, this Court by keeping the regular bail application pending grants interim bail to the petitioner purely on humanitarian ground for a period of 30(thirty) days with effect from the date of his actual release on bail on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by the learned Court in seisin of the case including the following conditions:-

(i) one of the sureties must be either his blood relation or family member, (ii) the petitioner is, however, advised to surrender to custody after expiry of the interim bail, failing which the Court in seisin over the matter is at liberty to take coercive steps to commit the petitioner to prison, (iii)the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly through others contact the victim or her family members. The petitioner shall not visit to the house or village of the victim, (iv) the petitioner shall not threaten, induce, influence or coerce any of the witnesses including the family members of the victim acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts before the Court.

5. Hence, the IA stands disposed of.

6. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

BLAPL No.11482 of 2025

7. Since Mr. Sandeep Raj Panda, learned counsel has already appeared for the informant, a copy of brief be supplied to him.

8. Indicating the name of Mr. Sandeep Raj Panda, as a counsel for the informant in the cause list as well as in the brief, list this matter on 02.02.2026.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge Subhasmita Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SUBHASMITA DAS Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 24-Dec-2025 18:11:22 Page 3 of 3

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top