SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5431

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
RAMA DEVI SAHOO – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMAPL No. 273 of 2024 An application under Chapter VIII, Rule-30 of the Orissa High Court Rules, 1948, for restoration.

---------------

Manoj Kumar Sahoo and Others …. Petitioners -versus-

Ram Devi Sahoo & Others …. Opp. Parties Advocate(s) appeared in this case:-

_______________________________________________________

For Petitioners : M/s. B. Mohanty, S. Sahoo &

N.K. Rout, Advocates Vs.

For Opp. Parties : M/s. A.K. Jena, R.N. Swain, A.P. Rath & P. Sinha, Advocates __________________________________________________________

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

JUDGMENT

23.12.2025 I.A. No.459 of 2025 SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

This an application filed by the petitioners seeking condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration (CMAPL) to restore the Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.

2. S.R. has pointed out delay of 1356 days. It is stated under paragraph-3 of the application that the petitioners had no knowledge about the Second Appeal being dismissed for non-prosecution and came to know only on 09.08.2025, when they received notice of the execution proceeding.

3. Mr. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the appeal was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top