ORISSA HIGH COURT
BIBHU DATTA TRIPATHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.35634 of 2025 Bibhu Datta Tripathy …. Petitioner Mr. Santosh Kumar Dash, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. Saswat Das, AGA CORAM:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
Order No. 23.12.2025
01. 1. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition assailing Clause-5 and Clause-18 of the Tender document, which are relatable to the eligibility criteria to the extent that the intending bidder must have executed similar nature of works during 2020-21 to 2024-25 duly certified by the concerned Superintendent Engineer / Executive Engineer / Assistant Engineer or equivalent in the prescribed form. Clause-18 relates to the submission of the certificate by the concerned Officer showing “similar work”, i.e., construction of a multistoried RCC framed composite building executed under one agreement for any authority/bodies of State/Central Government.
2. The foundation of the challenge to aforesaid clauses is based upon the registration of the petitioner as ‘A’ class contractor having a requisite educational qualification and all the expertise in executing the said work,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.