ORISSA HIGH COURT
SONALISHA ROUTRAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29098 of 2021 Sonalisha Routray …. Petitioner Mr. K.C. Sahu, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.P. Behera, ASC Mr. N. Barik, Advocate (For O.P. No.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
22.12.2025 Order No.
04. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. In the present writ petition, the following prayers have been made:-
“PRAYER It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court be graciously pleased to pass following relief(s):-
(i) The Hon’ble Court be pleased to admit &
allow tis writ petition, (ii) The Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash the impugned portion of the letters/order(s) under Annexure-4 & 5 so far it relates to non-inclusion of posts of MPHW(F)/ANM working under MHU/RBSK scheme of NHM and also to set-aside the impugned decision of the government as per impugned orders dtd.04.12.2020 under Annexure-7 so far it relates to regularization induction as well as declaration of MPHW(F) /ANM(s) who were juniors to the Petitioner as the status of government employees by declaring the said action of the government as illegal &
discriminatory one, (iii) The Hon’ble Court be pleased to further direc
Long-term casual employees performing perennial duties should be regularized despite administrative inertia, ensuring adherence to employment principles established in earlier legal precedents.
The principle of equality before the law, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of irrelevant factors, the principle of reasonableness, which requires that government action be based on rationa....
The court ruled that contract employees with over ten years of service against sanctioned posts are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the need for fair recruitment processes and age relaxation ....
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.