SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5593

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J
CHITTARANJAN DASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
W.P.(C) No. 27469 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: P.K. Nanda
For the Respondents: Sarita Moharana

Brick kiln units must strictly adhere to mandatory NGT guidelines, including obtaining a mining plan, environmental clearance, and consent to operate from the State Pollution Control Board, before commencing operations.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a writ of mandamus to direct the opposite parties to frame guidelines or a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) including environmental criteria for operating brick units in the district of Jharsuguda and to be enrolled in the District Survey Report. The petitioner claimed to possess a factory license, permission from the district administration, and MSME registration. The court found that the petitioner failed to produce mandatory environmental clearances and mining plans required by the National Green Tribunal (NGT) notification dated 10.08.2017. The primary issue was whether the petitioner was entitled to the issuance of guidelines or protection from administrative interference despite lacking mandatory environmental clearances. The court reasoned that since the requirements of the NGT notification—specifically the mining plan, environmental clearance, and consent to operate from the State Pollution Control Board—are mandatory, the notice issued by the Tahasildar was justified. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Table of Content
1. petition for brick unit guidelines and protection from administrative interference. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. competing claims regarding business licensing versus mandatory environmental compliance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. mandatory nature of ngt environmental clearances for brick kiln operations. (Para 7 , 8)

ORDER

Order No. 04.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayer:

“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue Rule Nisi calling upon the Opp. Party to show cause as to why a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s) shall not be issued to direct the Opp. Parties to frame a guidelines/ Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) including environmental criteria for the purpose of running bricks unit in the district of Jharsuguda and to enroll the petitioner in District Survey Report and further be pleased to restrain the Opposite Parties to interfere the business activities of the petitioner in the place of his business and on perusal of the causes so shown or insufficient causes shown to make the said rule absolute may pass such other order/orders as deemed just and proper.”

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is the recorded tenant of his plots in the district of Jharsuguda. The Petitioner has intended to do the brick manufacturing business. The Petitioner has availed factory license and permission from the district administration and also got the firm registered under MSME Department.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner further contends that while the Petitioner is continuing his business after obtaining certain documents, some officials are disturbing the business activities of the Petitioner.

6. Learned counsel for the State submits that as per the guidelines framed by the NGT vide notification dated 10.08.2017 the brick kiln unit shall have to obtain the mining plan, environmental clearance and consent to operate from the State Pollution Control Board. These requirements are mandatory. However, the Petitioner has failed to show the aforesaid requirements.

7. In such view of the matter, since the Petitioner has failed to show any of the aforesaid documents, the Tahasildar, Jharsuguda has rightly issued notice to the present Petitioner. Accordingly, the Petitioner has no right to come to the Court seeking the issuance of any guidelines by the Government. However, if any representation is filed by the Petitioner before the Tahasildar, Jharsuguda, the same shall be disposed of within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

8. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top