SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5674

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MAHESH CHANDRA BHOI @ MAHESH BHOI – Appellant
Versus
BHARAT BHUSAN PATRA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.1063 2025 Mahesh Chandra Bhol @ Mahesh …. Petitioner Bhol Mr. G. Sahu, Advocate -Versus-

Bharat Bhusan Patra …. Opposite Party None CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

18.12.2025 I.A. No.1528 of 2025 Order No.

01. 1. Heard Mr. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. Instant petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of delay in presenting the revision beyond the stipulated period.

3. A delay of 1139 days is reported as per the S.R.

4. It is submitted to the Court by Mr. Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner was outside the State and, hence, could not challenge the judgment in appeal at Annexure-2 dated 28th July, 2022 within the stipulated period and therefore, the delay is required to be condoned in the interest of justice.

5. In fact, the petitioner stands convicted for an offence under Section 138 N.I. Act and is directed to undergo sentence of six months S.I. and to pay compensation of Rs.7.5 lac and it has been confirmed by the learned court below.

6. Considering the delay and the reasons assigned by the petitioner, who claimed to have gone outside the State to earn his li

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top