SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5788

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KANHU CHARAN SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL 11983 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.11983 of 2025 Kanhu Charan Sahu Petitioner Mr. J. Sahoo, Advocate -versus-

State of Orissa Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM:

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER(ORAL)

Order No. 16.12.2025

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is the 2nd successive bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with PR Case No.99 of 2025-26 corresponding to 2(a) CC Case No.18 of 2025(N) pending in the file of learned Addl. Sessions Judge- cum-Special Judge, Aska for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.20(b)(ii)(C) of NDPS Act, on the main allegation of transporting 24Kgs of Contraband Ganja in a Maruti Suzuki Swift Dzire Car bearing Regd. No.OD-

07-AW-7369.

3. Heard, Mr. Jyotirmaya Sahoo, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record. On being queried about the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, Mr. Sahoo volunteers to withhold bail to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

4. Admittedly, the petitioner is in custody since 03.09.2025 and in the meantime, PR has already been submitted, however, the trial is yet to commence and there is no immediate prospect of trial. Further, it is claimed that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedents of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, especially when there is no immediate prospect of trial, the petitioner would be considered to have satisfied the conditions of Sec.37 of NDPS Act, if he is not having any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

5. For the reason stated hereinabove and taking into account the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody with submission of PR in the meantime, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail, but subject to verification of his criminal antecedents.

6. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh) only with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it.

Digitally Signed In view of the specific submission as advanced Signed by: JAYAKRUSHNA DASH Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cutftaockr the petitioner, the benefit of this order shall not be Date: 17-Dec-2025 12:03:28 extended to the petitioner, if he is found to have any criminal antecedent of similar nature for commission of offence under NDPS Act.

7. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

8. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge Jayakrushna

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top