SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5795

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BIKRAM GHADEI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
BLAPL 12049 / 2025



IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.12049 of 2025 Bikram Ghadei Petitioner Mr. S.N. Mishra-4, Advocate -versus-

State of Odisha Opposite Party Mr. M.R. Patra, Addl. PP CORAM:

JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY

ORDER(ORAL)

Order No. 16.12.2025

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode).

2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of the BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with Naikandihi PS Case No. 244 of 2025 corresponding to GR Case No.1109 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned JMFC, Basudevpur for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.115(2)/109(1)/351(3)/3(5) of BNS, on the main allegation of attempting to the life of the injured Sudarsan Senapati by assaulting him with lethal weapons like Bhujali and Rod causing serious injury to him.

3. Heard, Mr. Satya Narayan Mishra-4, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.R. Patra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor in the matter and perused the record.

4. After having considered the rival submissions upon perusal of record, there appears some allegation the Petitioner for assaulting the injured, but the impugned order of rejection of bail reveals that the injury report of the injured received from CHC, Basudevpur discloses that the injured has sustained simple injury, but the injury report received from DHH, Bhadrak reveals about the injured receiving grievous injury, however, the injured was referred to SCBMCH, Cuttack which has issued injury report to the injured by stating it to be simple which is confirmed by learned Addl. PP. Be that as it may, the injured has already been discharged from Hospital. In that view of the matter and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusations sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 06.10.2025 with substantial progress in investigation and keeping in view the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of an accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail.

5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it with following condition:-

(i) the petitioner shall report attendance before the Jurisdictional Police Station once in a fortnight preferably on a Sunday in each month in between 10 A.M. to 12 Noon for three (03) months from the actual date of release from the custody.

The I.I.C. of Jurisdictional Police Station shall not detain the petitioner unnecessarily after recording his attendance beyond the time as stipulated.

6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.

(G. Satapathy)

Judge Priyajit Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PRIYAJIT SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA Date: 18-Dec-2025 11:06:13

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top