SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5832

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SULOCHANA NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P. (C) No.25636 of 2025 Sulochana Nayak …. Petitioner Mr. L. Pradhan, Advocate -Versus-

State of Odisha & others …. Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC Mr. S.K. Baral, Advocate for the Intervener CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK

ORDER

16.12.2025 Order No.

09. 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned notice as at Annexure-3 dated 20th August, 2025 issued in connection with no confidence motion scheduled to be held on 25th September, 2025 received from opposite party No.4 on the grounds inter alia that the same is not legally tenable for having not complied with the requirements of Sections 24(2)(a) and 24(4) of the Odisha Grama Panchayats Act, 1964 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

3. Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was not served with the resolution and requisition accompanied with the impugned notice i.e. Annexure-3, hence, there is non-compliance of Section 24(2)(c) of the Act. The further submission is that the motion could not have been initiated against the petitioner, who is in-charge of Sarpanch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top