SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 5900

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PADMINI BALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.18321 of 2025

(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Padmini Bala …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. A.K. Parida,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty,

Standing Counsel

B. K. Nayak,

Advocate. (for O.P. No.5)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing and Judgment :18.08.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Balianta (O.P. No.3) to receive the deed for sale, if presented by the petitioner for registration. Because, the originals of the deed for sale vide Annexure-1 was presented by the petitioner before O.P. No.3 on dated 16.04.2025 for registration, but O.P. No.3

orally refused to receive the same.

For which, without getting any way, the petitioner approached this

Court by filing this writ petition praying for directing the O.P. No.3

through issuance of writ of mandamus to receive the deed for sale, if presented by the petitioner for r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top