ORISSA HIGH COURT
PADMINI BALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18321 of 2025
(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Padmini Bala …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioner - Mr. A.K. Parida,
Advocate.
For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty,
Standing Counsel
B. K. Nayak,
Advocate. (for O.P. No.5)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
Date of Hearing and Judgment :18.08.2025
A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Balianta (O.P. No.3) to receive the deed for sale, if presented by the petitioner for registration. Because, the originals of the deed for sale vide Annexure-1 was presented by the petitioner before O.P. No.3 on dated 16.04.2025 for registration, but O.P. No.3
orally refused to receive the same.
For which, without getting any way, the petitioner approached this
Court by filing this writ petition praying for directing the O.P. No.3
through issuance of writ of mandamus to receive the deed for sale, if presented by the petitioner for r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.