ORISSA HIGH COURT
RADHASHYAM MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
WP(C) No.22043 of 2025
An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India. ***
Radhashyam Mishra
… Petitioner.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others
… Opposite Parties
Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Padhi, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.
P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Date of Hearing : 02.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 02.09.2025
JUDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1.
This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Tahasildar, Pipili (O.P. No.2) to carry out (implementation of) the final order dated 18.07.2014 passed in Revision Petition No.64 of 2013 by the Commissioner Consolidation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar.
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the Opp. Parties
3. The law has already been settled by the Apex Court in the ratio of the decision reported in Jayamma & Others Vrs. Deputy Commissioner, Hassan, Dist., Hassan & Others (Para No.10) reported in III (2013) CLT 94 (SC) that, “if a subordinate authority in th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.