ORISSA HIGH COURT
HARMOHAN MANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.23797 of 2025
(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Harmohan Mansingh …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioner - Mr. M. Panigrahi,
Advocate.
For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty,
Standing Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
Date of Hearing and Judgment :02.09.2025
A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Bolagarh in the District of Khurda (O.P.
No.2) to accept the deed for sale.
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Standing Counsel for the State.
3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar cannot orally refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to
register the same indicating the reasons for non-registration, if that document is not legally fit for registration.
According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa Registration Rules, 19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.