SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6008

ORISSA HIGH COURT
HARMOHAN MANSINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23797 of 2025

(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Harmohan Mansingh …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and another …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. M. Panigrahi,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty,

Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing and Judgment :02.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Bolagarh in the District of Khurda (O.P.

No.2) to accept the deed for sale.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrar cannot orally refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to

register the same indicating the reasons for non-registration, if that document is not legally fit for registration.

According to The Registration Act, 1908 and The Orissa Registration Rules, 19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top