ORISSA HIGH COURT
KAMALA SETHY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.24157 of 2025
Kamala Sethy ..... Petitioner
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Patra,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties
Mr. Pravakar Behera, Standing Counsel for
Transport Department
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K. PANIGRAHI
Order ORDER
04.09.2025
No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid
arrangement.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The present Writ Petition has been filed by the
Petitioner with the following prayer:
“Therefore, the petitioner most respectfully
prays that this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased enough to admit this writ petition, issue rule NISI calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the VCRs under Annexure-2 series issued /drawn against the Vehicle of the petitioner bearing Regd. No. OD29D8289 shall be transmitted to the Court of learned J.M.F.C.(Transport), Cuttack for disposal of the same as per law, And if the Opposite Parties do not show cause or show
Signature Not Verified
insufficient cause the rule may be made absolute by issuing appropriate writ directing the O.P No.2 to transmit/forward the VCRs under Annexure-2 series to the Court of learned J.M.F.C.(Transport)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.