SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6105

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH KIRAN MAJHI – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. SUB COLLECTOR BERHAMPUR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.36232 of 2023

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Santosh Kiran Majhi …. Petitioner

-versus-

Addl. Sub-Collector, Berhampur, …. Opposite Parties

Ganjam and others

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. S. Biswal,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. P. Mohanty,

Sr.Advocate. (for O.P. No.2)

Mr. G. Mohanty,

Sanding Counsel (for O.P. Nos.1 & 4)

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :11.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment :11.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner,

learned senior advocate for O.P. No.2 and learned SC for O.P. Nos.1 & 4. 2. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing (setting aside) the final order dated 18.07.2023 (Annexure-4) passed by the Addl. Sub-Collector, Berhampur, Ganjam (O.P. No.1) in Mutation Appeal Case No.88 of 2023 on the ground that, the petitioner (who was the respondent

by the Addl. Sub-Collector, Berhampur, Ganjam (O.P. No.1). For which, the said order vide Annexure-4 is required to be quashed.

To whi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top