ORISSA HIGH COURT
BINODINI NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.1898 of 2025
In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the
Constitution of India, 1950.
----
Binodini Nayak …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties
Advocates Appeared in this case
For Petitioner - Dr. Jitendra Kumar Lenka
B.Mohapatra & A.K. Sahoo
(Advocates)
For Opp. Parties - Mr.J.K. Ray,
ASC for O.Ps1 to 4
---
CORAM
MR. JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date of Hearing & Judgment : 16.09.2025
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PER DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD, J
One Ramesh Chandra Parida was appointed as a Hindi
Teacher vide order dated 14.12.1991. However, for remaining unauthorized absence, his services came to be terminated on 27.02.2004. To that vacancy, petitioner came to be appointed after selection vide order dated 05.01.2005 (Annexure-1). Her
appointment was approved on 17.04.2012 with effect from 01.04.2008 vide Annexure-3. Mr. Parida challenged his termination in W.P.(C) No.7512 of 2012, which was dismissed on 19.07.2018. His Writ Appeal No.434 of 2008 also met the sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.