SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6129

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BINODINI NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.1898 of 2025

In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950.

----

Binodini Nayak …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties

Advocates Appeared in this case

For Petitioner - Dr. Jitendra Kumar Lenka

B.Mohapatra & A.K. Sahoo

(Advocates)

For Opp. Parties - Mr.J.K. Ray,

ASC for O.Ps1 to 4

---

CORAM

MR. JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing & Judgment : 16.09.2025

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PER DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD, J

One Ramesh Chandra Parida was appointed as a Hindi

Teacher vide order dated 14.12.1991. However, for remaining unauthorized absence, his services came to be terminated on 27.02.2004. To that vacancy, petitioner came to be appointed after selection vide order dated 05.01.2005 (Annexure-1). Her

appointment was approved on 17.04.2012 with effect from 01.04.2008 vide Annexure-3. Mr. Parida challenged his termination in W.P.(C) No.7512 of 2012, which was dismissed on 19.07.2018. His Writ Appeal No.434 of 2008 also met the sa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top