SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6130

ORISSA HIGH COURT
LACHHAMANA TANDI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.24696 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Lachhamana Tandi & Another

Petitioners.

-VERSUS-

State of Odisha & Others

Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ghanashyam Das, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 16.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 16.09.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1.

This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Titilagarh in the district of Bolangir (O.P. No.5) to accept the deed of sale of the petitioners for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar, Titilagarh in the district of Bolangir (O.P. No.5) orally refused to receive that deed for sale for registration stating that, their co-sharers have not signed in that deed for sale. For which, without getting any way, the petitioners has filed this writ petition praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Titilagarh in the district of Bolangir (O.P. No.5) to receive the deed for sale of the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top