SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6160

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MANJULI NAIK @ MANJULI KUMARI NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.25516 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Smt. Manjuli Naik @ Manjuli Kumari Nayak

Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

State of Orissa & Others

Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Karunakar Rath, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Ms. J. Sahoo, Addl. Standing Counsel.

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 18.09.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 18.09.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1.

This writ petition under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the District Sub-Registrar, Sundargarh (O.P. No.4) in the district of Sundargarh to accept the deed of sale of the petitioner for registration, because, the District Sub-Registrar, Sundargarh (O.P. No.4) orally refused to receive that deed for sale for registration stating that, her co- sharers have not signed in that deed for sale and there is no document showing the falling of the sold properties in her share through partition.

2. Heard from the learned counsels of both the sides.

3. The law is very much clear that, the District Sub-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top