SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6167

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANTOSH KUMAR MOHAKUD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.21222 of 2025

(In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India)

Santosh Kumar Mahakud …. Petitioner

-versus-

The State of Odisha, represented …. Opposite Parties

through its Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management,

Odisha, Bhubaneswar and another

Appeared in this case:-

For Petitioner : Mr. Budhiram Das, Advocate

For Opposite Parties : Mr. T. Kumar,

Learned Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE A.C. BEHERA

JUDGMENT

Date of hearing : 19.09.2025 / date of judgment : 19.09.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of

India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub- Registrar, Khaira (Opposite Party No.2) to receive and register the deed for sale of the petitioner, because, the Opposite Party No.2 orally refused to receive the deed for sale(original of Annexure-1) of the petitioner for its registration expressing that, petitioner being one of the co-owner of the properties covered under that deed for sale cannot transfer/alienate his undivided interest in the said properties without the consent of his co-

owners.

2. Heard from t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top