IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.29474 of 2011

Hadibandhu Palei and another …. Petitioners

-Versus-

Dayanidh Dash and others …. Opposite Parties

Advocates appeared in this case :

For Petitioners : Mr. A.C. Mohapatra, Advocate For Opposite Parties : Mr. D.K. Mohapatra, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’ BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

J U D G M E N T

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing and Judgment : 19th September, 2025

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HARISH TANDON, CJ.

1. The present case is a classical example of reminding the off quoted observation of Sir Vivian Bose, an eminent jurist of the

apex Court that “the real trouble starts after getting the decree”.

2. The parties are litigating at the execution stage despite the decree having attained finality. A decree for permanent injunction

restraining the judgment debtors from interfering with the peaceful possession of the decree holder in respect of a subject property was passed by the trial court. Alleging the violation of the said decree for permanent injunction, an execution proceeding was filed under Order 21 Rule 32 of the Code of C