ORISSA HIGH COURT
RAMA BISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WP(C) 27891 / 2025
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
WP(C) No.27891 of 2025
An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of
India. ***
Rama Biswal & Others
… Petitioners.
-VERSUS-
State of Odisha & Others
… Opposite Parties
Counsel appeared for the parties:
For the Petitioners : Mr. A.C. Behera, Advocate
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.
P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE
MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA
Date of Hearing : 14.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 14.10.2025
JUDGMENT
ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing Tahasildar, Rampur in the District of
passed in R.C. No.406/2024 by the Secretary to Revenue wherein, the Revenue Divisional Commissioner had directed the Tahasildar, Rampur for preparation of separate R.o.R of the case land in the name of the petitioners (those are the LRs of the vendee).
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the State (Opp. Parties).
3. It appears from Annexure-4 attached by the petitioners in this writ petition that, the Tahasildar, Rampur has directed R.I. Bhatbahali to make necessary changes in the R.o.R in compliance to the directions given by the Secretary to Revenue Divisional Commissioner, Northern Division, Sambalpur in R.C. No.406 of 2024 following due procedures.
4. When the R.I. Bhatbahali is a staff of Rampur Tahasil and when the Tahasildar, Rampur has directed R.I. Bhatbahali for necessary correction in the R.o.R of the case land in favour of the petitioner on the basis of the order passed in R.C. No.406/2024 by the Secretary to Revenue then, at this juncture, there is no necessity under law to give any direction in this writ petition to the Tahasildar, Rampur because the order passed in R.C. No.406 of 2024 has already been implemented by the Tahasildar, Rampur.
So, on the basis of the above Annexure-4, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is required to be disposed of finally.
Therefore, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the R.I. Bhatbahali for receiving the rents from the petitioners in respect of the corrected R.o.R on the basis of the directions issued by the Tahasildar, Rampur.
5. On the basis of the aforesaid observations, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of finally.
(ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA)
JUDGE High Court of Orissa, Cuttack The 14 .10. 2025// Rati Ranjan Nayak Signature S N r. o Ste t n o V gr e ap r h i e f r i e d Digitally Signed Signed by: RATI RANJAN NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India.
Date: 16-Oct-2025 20:55:17
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.