SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6310

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANJUKTA GIRI – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHASILDAR CUTTACK SADAR – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.28600 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Sanjukta Giri

Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar Opposite Party

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. P.K. Khuntia, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty, Standing Counsel.

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 14.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 14.10.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus against the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar (Opp. Party) for registration of her application under Section 8-A of the OLR Act, 1960 for conversion of the case land from “Jalasaya” to “Gharabari”, because the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar (Opp. Party) did not receive/accept her application under Section 8-A of the OLR Act, 1960.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law concerning receiving an application submitted by a party before the Court or an authority like the Tahasildar, Cuttack Sadar (Opp. Party) has already been clarified by the Hon’ble Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top