ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRAMILA DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.29297 of 2025
(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)
Pramila Das …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioner - Mr. S.K. Nayak,
Advocate.
For Opposite Parties- Mr. G. Mohanty,
Learned Sanding Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
Date of Hearing :22.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :22.10.2025
A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (Opposite Party No.2) in the district of Khurda to receive the deed for sale of the petitioner for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (Opposite Party
registration.
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Standing Counsel for the State.
3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrars like Opposite Party No.2(Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri) cannot orally refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to registe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.