SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6363

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRAMILA DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.29297 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Pramila Das …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. S.K. Nayak,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. G. Mohanty,

Learned Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :22.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :22.10.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (Opposite Party No.2) in the district of Khurda to receive the deed for sale of the petitioner for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri (Opposite Party

registration.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrars like Opposite Party No.2(Sub-Registrar, Khandagiri) cannot orally refuse to receive any document, when the same is presented for registration. He/she is either to register the document or to refuse to registe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top