SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6395

ORISSA HIGH COURT
MADHUSMITA BHATTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.19428 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Madhusmita Bhatta …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. K.C.R.Mohapatra,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. Gyanalok Mohanty,

Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :27.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :27.10.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Sub-Registrar, Begunia (Opposite Party No.4) in the district of Khordha to accept the deed for sale (original of Annexure-6 series) of the Petitioner for registration, because, the Sub-Registrar, Begunia

the petitioner for registration.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law is very much clear that, the Sub-Registrars like Opposite Party No.4 i.e. the Sub-Registrar, Begunia in the District of Khordha cannot orally refuse to receive/accept any document, when the same is presented f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top