SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6424

ORISSA HIGH COURT
AJITA KUMAR SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.18902 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Ajita Kumar Sahoo …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. N.K. Sahu,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. S. Nayak,

Learned Additional Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :28.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :28.10.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing Tahasildar, Nayagarh (Opposite Party No.3) to register his application for mutation, to which, he(petitioner) had presented before the Tahasildar, Nayagarh (Opposite Party No.3) on dated 25.10.2024 and which is with him (Tahasildar, Nayagarh, Opposite Party No.3) in its office, as till yet since 25.10.2024, the Tahasildar, Nayagarh (Opposite Party No.3) is not registering the said

application for mutation of the petitioner as a mutation case.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State.

3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top