ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUSANTI PATTANAYAK – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18480 of 2025
(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)
Susanti Pattanayak …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties
Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement
(Virtual/Physical Mode):
For Petitioner - Mr. M.R. Padhy,
Advocate.
For Opposite Parties- Mr. G. Mohanty,
Learned Sanding Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA
Date of Hearing :30.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment :30.10.2025
A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Tahasildar Buguda for implementation of the order dated 08.06.2011 passed in SRP No.410 of 2006 by the Joint Commissioner,
Settlement and Consolidation, Berhampur(Opposite Party No.2).
2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Standing Counsel for the State.
3. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified by the Apex Court in a case between Jayamma and others vrs. The Dy. Commr. Hassan Dist. Hassan and others : reported in
2013(3) Civil Law Times-94 that, “if a Sub-ordinate authorities in Government does not act
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.