SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6449

ORISSA HIGH COURT
NILANDRI@ NILANDHRI RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.28881 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Nilandri @ Nilandhri Rana

Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

State of Odisha & Others

Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Panda, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. T. Kumar, Addl. Standing Counsel.

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 30.10.2025 :: Date of Judgment : 30.10.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for directing the Tahasildar, Kalahandi (Opp. Party No.3) to receive/accept the application (original of Annexure-4) for Mutation filed by the petitioner under Annexure-4, because, the Tahasildar, Kalahandi (Opp. Party No.3) orally refused to receive the application for Mutation of the petitioner.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

3. The law concerning refusal of the Tahasildar to receive an application for Mutation submitted by a party like the petitioner has already been clarified in the ratio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top