SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6512

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SURYA NARAYAN PATTANAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.17980 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Surya Narayan Patanayak …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. M.R. Padhy,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. S. Nayak,

Learned Additional Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :07.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :07.11.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Tahasildar Buguda for implementation of the order dated

Settlement and Consolidation, Berhampur(Opposite Party No.2).

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified by the Apex Court in a case between Jayamma and others vrs. The Dy. Commr. Hassan Dist. Hassan and others : reported in

2013(3) Civil Law Times-94 that, “if a Sub-ordinate authorities in Government does not act in terms of directions or instructions issued by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top