IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23743 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Sk. Samul Haqk and another …. Petitioners

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. M.R. Padhy,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. S. Nayak,

Learned Additional Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :07.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :07.11.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Tahasildar Jharsuguda for implementation of the order dated Commissioner Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur sole Opposite

Party.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Standing Counsel for the State.

3. On this aspect, the propositions of law has already been clarified by the Apex Court in a case between Jayamma and others vrs. The Dy. Commr. Hassan Dist. Hassan and others : reported in

2013(3) Civil Law Times-94 that, “if a Sub-ordinate authorities in Government does not act in terms of directions or instructions issued by the superior authority, it is not for the High Court to compel that, Sub-ordinate authority to comply with the instructions or directions issued by the superior authority. Because, High Court is not the executing forum of the instructions issued by the Government or superior officers of the Government to their Sub-ordinate Officers, because, it is the duty of the superior officer(who passed the order) to see the implementation of its own order by its Sub-ordinate. The High Court is not the executing forum of instructions/directions issued by the Superior Authority of the Government to its Subordinate Officers. So, it is the duty of the Superior Authority of the Government(who passed the order) to implement his/her own order properly.”

4. In view of the principles of law enunciated by the Apex Court in the ratio of the aforesaid decision, it is the duty of the superior officer of the Government to see that, his/her order/direction is implemented by its sub-ordinate officer, to whom, the direction was issued for implementation.

5. So, by applying the propositions of law enunciated in the ratio of the aforesaid decision of the Apex Court, it is felt proper to dispose of this writ petition finally giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the authority, i.e., Additional Commissioner Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur sole Opposite Party, who had passed the order on dated proper implementation by the Tahasildar, Jharsuguda, annexing the certified copy of this judgment and in case of non-response to the same, the petitioners can approach the High Court seeking appropriate relief concerning non-response of their application by Additional Commissioner Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur sole Opposite Party.

6. So, with the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is disposed of finally.

(A.C. Behera), Judge Orissa High Court, Cuttack The 7^th of November, 2025/ Jagabandhu, P.A.

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: JAGABANDHU BEHERA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CUTTACK Date: 07-Nov-2025 18:16:15