SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 48

ORISSA HIGH COURT
LINGARAJ KHATAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.13190 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Lingaraj Khatai and others …. Petitioners

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioners - Mr. K.C. Mohanty, Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. T. Kumar,

Learned Additional Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :09.01.2026 :: Date of Judgment :09.01.2026

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners under

Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for directing the Additional Sub-collector, Puri-cum-Consolidation Officer, Nimapara in the district of Puri(Opposite Party No.4) for implementation of the direction issued by the Director, Consolidation, Odisha, Board of R.P. No.267 of 2014. Because, the direction, which was given by the Director, Consolidation, Odisha, Board of Revenue Odisha,

2014 to the Additional Sub-collector, Puri-cum-Consolidation Officer, Nimapara (Opposite Party No.4) for implementation, the said direction of the Opposite Party No.2 has not been implemented by the Oppos

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top