SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 81

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BUDHIA NAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 32522 of 2025

Budhia Naik & others Petitioners

Mr. H.K. Mohanta, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha & others Opposite Parties

Mr. Manmaya Kumar Dash, Additional Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH

ORDER

Order No. 08.01.2026

03. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The grievance of the Petitioners in this Writ Application is with regard to the inaction of the Collector, Mayurbhanj, in referring the applications filed by the Petitioners filed on 30.05.2025 and 02.06.2025 (Annexures-4 and 6 respectively) to the Authority under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act, 2013 (for brevity, ‘the Act’).

3. Mr. Mohanta, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that Plot No.31 and 47 of Khata No.61 situated in village Takadida under Rasgopbindpur Tahasil in the district Mayurbhanj was acquired under the provisions of the Act. It is submitted that out of the aforesaid two plots, the Petitioners had alienated Ac.1.38 dec. to the School and Mass Education Department for construction of the school,

but the rest of the property

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top