ORISSA HIGH COURT
WASIM AKHTAR KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
ABLAPL 1466 / 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No. 1466 of 2025
Wasim Akhtar Khan …. Petitioner
Mr. G. Rout, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha …. Opposite Party
Mr. C. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH
ORDER
07.01.2026
Order No.
03. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The Petitioner is seeking pre-arrest bail in connection with Special (NDPS) Case No.15(B) of 2021 pending on the file of learned District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (NDPS), Bhadrak, arising out of Special Task Force (Crime Branch) P.S. Case No.05 of 2021 for commission of offences punishable under
Sections 21(c)1 and 292 of NDPS Act.
preparation containing any manufactured drug shall be punishable,— (a) xxx xxx
(b) xxx xxx
(c) where the contravention involves commercial quantity, with rigorous imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend to twenty years, and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to
two lakh rupees:
Provided that the court may, for reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a
fine exceeding two lakh rupees.
offence.
(2) A person abets, or is a party to a criminal conspiracy to commit, an offence, within the meaning of this section, who, in India, abets or is a party to the criminal conspiracy to the
commission of any act in a place without and beyond India which—
(a) would constitute an offence if committed within India; or
(b) under the laws of such place, is an offence relating to narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances having all the legal conditions required to constitute it such an offence the same
3. The allegation against the present Petitioner is that he along with one of the co-accused, namely, Mir Minhaj Quadri, were involved in the trade and transportation of the contraband (Brown Sugar) to the tune of 1kg 140grms.
4. It is apt to note that it is the case of the prosecution that the co-accused, namely, Mir Minhaj Quadri, was nabbed along with the contraband and charge sheet is filed against him and the basis of the implication of the Petitioner is on account of the statement of the said co-accused and as such the Petitioner was cited as an absconder in the charge sheet.
5. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the co-accused, namely, Mir Minhaj Quadri, who faced trial was acquitted by judgment dated 26.06.2024 by the learned Special Judge, Bhadrak in Special Case No.15 of 2021 and the attention of this Court is drawn to the grounds of acquittal, which for convenience of reference is culled out hereunder:-
“(i) non-compliance of mandatory provisions of Sec.42(2)3, 50(6)4 of the NDPS Act, 1985.
(ii) non-compliance of directory provisions of Sec. 52A5, 556, 577 & 678 of the NDPS Act.
as or analogous to the legal conditions required to constitute it an offence punishable under this Chapter, if committed within India.
xxx xxx xxx (2) Where an officer takes down any information in writing under sub-section (1) or records grounds for his belief under the proviso thereto, he shall within seventy-two hours send a copy thereof to his immediat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.