ORISSA HIGH COURT
ROKKAM ANANTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMP No.975 of 2025
Rokkam Ananta …. Petitioner
Mr. Surendra Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
State of Orissa and Others …. Opposite Parties
Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat, AGA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No. 12.01.2026
06. (Through Hybrid mode)
1. The grievance of the Petitioner is that although the learned Grama Nyayadhikari-cum-J.M.F.C., Kashinagar has issued process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. but the provisions under Section 82 of
the Cr.P.C. has not been complied with.
2. Mr. Surendra Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that as required under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. (i) proclamation has not been publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which the accused ordinarily resides; (ii) it has not been affixed in some conspicuous part of the house of the accused’ (iii) copy has not been
affixed in some conspicuous part of the Court-house.
3. Perused the report dated 09.01.2026 of the learned District Judge, Gajapati, Paralakhemundi who has submitted where it has been inter alia
stated as follows:
“With reference to Order No.5 dated 08.12.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CRLMP No. 975 of 2025, I a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.