SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 334

ORISSA HIGH COURT
ROKKAM ANANTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CRLMP No.975 of 2025

Rokkam Ananta …. Petitioner

Mr. Surendra Mohanty, Advocate

-versus-

State of Orissa and Others …. Opposite Parties

Mr. Ashok Kumar Apat, AGA

CORAM:

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

Order No. 12.01.2026

06. (Through Hybrid mode)

1. The grievance of the Petitioner is that although the learned Grama Nyayadhikari-cum-J.M.F.C., Kashinagar has issued process under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. but the provisions under Section 82 of

the Cr.P.C. has not been complied with.

2. Mr. Surendra Mohanty, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that as required under Section 82 of the Cr.P.C. (i) proclamation has not been publicly read in some conspicuous place of the town or village in which the accused ordinarily resides; (ii) it has not been affixed in some conspicuous part of the house of the accused’ (iii) copy has not been

affixed in some conspicuous part of the Court-house.

3. Perused the report dated 09.01.2026 of the learned District Judge, Gajapati, Paralakhemundi who has submitted where it has been inter alia

stated as follows:

“With reference to Order No.5 dated 08.12.2025 passed by the Hon’ble Court in CRLMP No. 975 of 2025, I a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top