ORISSA HIGH COURT
KANHU CHARAN BARIK – Appellant
Versus
CONVEY SECRETARY – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.4661 of 2018
Kanhu Charan Barik …. Petitioner
Mr. Subrat Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Convenor-Secretary, Odisha …. Opp. Parties
State Commission for Women
and others
Mr. K.K. Mishra, Advocate
(for O.P. No.1)
Mr. P.K. Mohanty, ASC
(for O.P. No.2)
Opposite Party No.3-none
CORAM:
JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO
ORDER
12.01.2026
(Hybrid Mode)
Order No.
08
.
1. Though notice is sufficient on opposite party no.3 and learned counsel have entered appearance on behalf of opposite party no.3 none appears when the matter is called. In view of the order that is to be passed today in the writ application, this Court is not awaiting further for
appearance of opposite party no.3.
2. The writ application has been filed challenging the office letter dated 03.06.2017 issued by the Member, Odisha State Commission for Women on 06.06.2017 to the opposite party no.2 recommending for deducting monthly maintenance amount at Rs.8,000/- per month from the monthly salary of the petitioner who was then working as
Diarist in the establishment of the opposite party no.2-
authority.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the State Commission for Women does not ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.