SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 347

ORISSA HIGH COURT
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
AMIYA KANTI PATNAIK – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.23009 of 2024

Union of India & others …. Petitioners

Mr. P. K. Parhi, DSGI

Mr. Satya Sindhu Kashyap, CGC

-versus-

Amiya Kanti Patnaik …. Opp. Party

Mr. Jagamohan Pattnaik, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD

JUSTICE CHITTA RANJAN DASH

ORDER

12.01.2026 Order No.

The Union Government & its officials are knocking

09.

at the doors of the Writ Court assailing impugned 05.03.2024 passed in O.A No. 260/402 of 2021 by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack. The

operative portion of the said order reads as under:- “12. Thus, viewed from any angle, as discussed above, this Tribunal do not find any justification in keeping the recommendation of the DPC finding the applicant 'FIT' under deemed sealed cover when giving promotion to his juniors. Accordingly, the impugned order of rejection communicated vide F.No.C- 18011/31/2014-Ad.II dated 12th March, 2021 (A/5) is hereby quashed. Since the applicant has already been found 'FIT' by the DPC, the respondents are directed to promote the applicant to the post of Joint Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs with

effect from the date his junior was promoted vide order dated 31.12.2

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top