SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 371

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KIRAN BALA PATRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.784 of 2026

(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Kiranbala Patra and Others …. Petitioners

-versus-

State of Odisha and Another …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioners - Ms. A. Mohanty,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. G. Mohanty,

Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing and Judgment :09.01.2026

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for directing the Tahasildar, Rasgovindpur (Opposite Party No.2) to receive the applications for mutation of the petitioners, as the Tahasildar, Rasgovindpur (Opposite Party No.2) did not receive the applications for mutation of the petitioners on the basis of the final decree passed in their favour in a partition suit vide C.S. No.17 of 2005 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baripada expressing about the non-submission

of measurement particulars of the decreetal properties with the respective applications for mutation.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top