SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6561

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SURATHABALA – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

S.A. No.134 of 1992

(In the matter of an appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908)

Suratha Bala Das (dead) and Appellants

another ....

-versus-

Narendra Kumar Das and others .... Respondents

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Appellants - Mr. A. K. Mohanty,

Advocate.

For Respondents - Mr. S.K. Sahoo,

Advocate.

[for respondent Nos.11(a) to

11(f)]

Mr. B. K. Padhi,

Advocate.

On behalf of

Mr. P. Kar,

Advocate. CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :24.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :23.12.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This 2nd appeal has been preferred against the

confirming judgment.

2. The appellants in this 2nd appeal are the successors of the defendant No.1 in the suit vide O.S. No.23 of 1983-I and they were the appellants before the 1st Appellate Court in the 1st Appeal vide S.J. Appeal No.40 of

1986-I.

The respondent Nos.1 to 5 in this 2nd appeal were the plaintiff Nos.1 to 3, 5 & 6 along with their widow mother Pata Dei as plaintiff No.4 before the Trial Court in the suit vide O.S. No.23 of 1983-I.

The respondent Nos.7 to 10 are the successors of the defendant No.2 before the Trial Court in the suit vide

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top