ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.19732 of 2013

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Smt. Rukmani Nayak & Another

… Petitioners.

-VERSUS-

Pradip Kumar Nayak & Others

… Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioners : Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : None. (for Opp. Party Nos.1 to 4)

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 02.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment :23.12.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners (appellants before the 1^st Appellate Court in R.F.A. No.34/2006 arising out of C.S. No.900 of 2006) against the Opp. Parties (respondents in R.F.A. No.34/2006 arising out of C.S. No.900 of 2006) praying for quashing (setting aside) the impugned order dated 01.08.2013 (Annexure-3) passed in R.F.A. No.34/2006.

2. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, the petitioners being the appellants filed R.F.A. No.34/2006 challenging the compromise decree passed on dated 06.01.1977 in T.S. No.66 of 1976 by the lea