SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6578

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRASANTA KUMAR SAMANTARAY – Appellant
Versus
TAHASILDAR ERSAMA JAGATSINGHPUR – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.36532 of 2015

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Prasanta Kumar Samantaray

Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

Tahasildar, Ersama & Others

Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. B.S. Das, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. G. Mohanty. Standing Counsel.

(State-Opp. Parties)

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 23.12.2025 :: Date of Judgment :23.12.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing the orders dated 22.02.2024 & 18.03.2024 passed in Mutation Case No.6/2024 by the Tahasildar, Ersama (Opp. Party No.1).

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-Opp. Parties.

3. The impugned order dated 18.03.2024 passed in Mutation Case No.6/2024 is as follows:-

18/03/2024 “The case is taken up today. As per the report of the RI the case is hereby disallowed.”

Devi Prasad Acharya.

Tahasildar, Ersama

4. The above order dated 18.03.2024 passed by O.P. No.1 in Mutation Case No.6/2024 is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top