SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6587

ORISSA HIGH COURT
RASMITA SAHANI – Appellant
Versus
A.D.M. CUTTACK andORS. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C). No. 17490 of 2010

(An Application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution

of India)

Rasmita Sahani ...… Petitioner

-Versus-

A.D.M., Cuttack & Others .... Opposite Parties

_____________________________________________

For Petitioner : Ms. B.K.Pattnaik, Advocate,

For Opp. Party : Mr. S.S.Routray, ASC

_______________________________________________________

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

JUDGMENT

3rd December, 2025

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

The petitioner questions the correctness of order

dated 09.09.2010 passed by the Sub-Collector, Sadar,

Cuttack in Misc. Case No. 5 of 2008.

2. The short facts of the case are that the petitioner had submitted her candidature for engagement as Anganwadi Worker pursuant to advertisement dated 17.04.2008

issued by the CDPO, Mahanga. In the selection process that followed, the petitioner was found to have secured the highest marks among all candidates and was therefore, recommended for selection. One of the candidates, namely, Jayanti Maharana questioned the selection of the petitioner by filing an appeal before the Sub-Collector, Sadar being AWC Misc. Appeal Case No. 5 of 2008. Said appeal was disposed of by order dated

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top