SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6610

ORISSA HIGH COURT
RAMA CHANDRA PADHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK

WP(C) No.31386 of 2025

An application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of

India. ***

Rama Chandra Padhi

Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

State of Odisha & Others

Opposite Parties

Counsel appeared for the parties:

For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Behera, Advocate

For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Nayak, Addl. Standing Counsel.

(For the State)

P R E S E N T: HONOURABLE

MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA

Date of Hearing : 29.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :29.11.2025

JUDGMENT

ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA, J.

1. This writ petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing the final order dated 21.11.2024 passed in S.R.P. No.775 of 2018 by the Addl. Commissioner of Settlement and Consolidation, Berhampur-II, Ganjam (Opp.

Party No.2).

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State-Opp. Parties.

3. During the course of hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, the case land was settled in the name of the petitioner by the Tahasildar, Ganjam in L.E.A. Case No.60/1962 and the petitioner had filed the order of Settlement of the case land in his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top