SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6613

ORISSA HIGH COURT
GITANJALI JENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.33539 of 2025

(An application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950) Gitanjali Jena …. Petitioner

-versus-

State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioner - Mr. R.N. Behera,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties - Mr. Tej Kumar,

Standing Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing and Judgment :29.11.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioner challenging the impugned order dated 11.10.2025 (Annexure-2) passed in Mutation No.4) on the ground of non-providing of opportunity of being heard to

the petitioner.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ASC

for the State.

3. The case of the petitioner is that, she (petitioner) filed this writ petition praying for quashing the impugned order dated 11.10.2025 Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (O.P. No.4) on the ground that, the said order has been passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to her (petitioner).

The impugned order vide Annexure-2 passed by the Addl.

Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top