SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6615

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BANDANA MANGARAJ – Appellant
Versus
THE ARCHDIOCESE OF CUTTACK-BHUBANESWAR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP No. 40 of 2024

[An application under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India]

Bandana Mangaraj. Petitioner

-Versus-

The Archdiocese of Cuttack-

Bhubaneswar and another.. Opp. Parties

Advocate(s) appeared in this case:

For Petitioner : M/s. Soumya Mishra, A. Agarwal,

B. Behera, G.N. Parida, Advocates.

For Opp.Parties : None

_________________________________________________________

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

JUDGMENT

28th November, 2025

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J.

The petitioner is the plaintiff in C.S. No. 89 of 2011

pending in the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge (L.R.), Bhubaneswar. In the present application filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, she questions the

correctness of order dated 20.11.2023 passed by the Court below in rejecting her prayer for amendment of the plaint in so far as the same relates to the relief of grant of compensation for breach of contract in terms of Section 21 of the Specific Relief Act.

2. The facts of the case are that the suit property was originally recorded in the name of defendant No.1, who intended to sell the same. The plaintiff having agreed to purchase the land, an agreement for sale was execu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top