SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6623

ORISSA HIGH COURT
TILOTTAMA NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11775 of 2022

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Tilottama Nayak and Others …. Petitioners

-versus-

State of Odisha and Others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioners - Mr. B.K. Behera-1,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Smt. J. Sahoo,

Addl. Standing Counsel.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :28.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :28.11.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India, 1950 has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing (setting aside) the final order dated 24.09.2019 (Annexure-3) passed in Revision Petition No.222 of 2015 by the Commissioner, Land

Records & Settlement, Board of Revenue, Odisha, Cuttack.

2. Heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned ASC

for the State.

3. The factual backgrounds of this writ petition, which prompted the petitioners for filing of the same is that, they (petitioners) had filed revision petition vide Revision Petition No.222 of 2015 under Section 15(b) of the O.S.S. Act, 1958 before the Commissioner, Land Records

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top