SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6627

ORISSA HIGH COURT
LAXMIPRIYA RAUTRAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.19711 of 2023

Application under Articles 226 & 227 of Constitution of

India.

---------------

Laxmipriya Routray …… Petitioner

- Versus –

State of Odisha and Others ...…. Opp. Parties

Advocate(s) appeared in this case:-

_____________________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s) : M/s. B. Mansingh &

A.Behera, Advocates

For Opp. Parties : Mr. S. N Patnaik

[Addl. Government Advocate]

___________________________________________________________

CORAM:

JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

JUDGMENT

28.11.2025

SASHIKANTA MISHRA, J. The petitioner has filed this writ

application with the following prayer:-

“In the premises, aforesaid the petitioner

prays that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be

pleased to allow this application and after hearing the parties and quash the order of disengagement and appellant order under Annexures 1 and 6 by restoring the petitioner’s service as Anganwadi worker at Haladigoroda Center Dist-Puri.

And/or pass any such other order(s)/direction(s)/writ (s) as are deemed just and proper.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall every pray.”

FACTS

2. Pursuant to an advertisement issued by the CDPO, Delang t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top