SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6629

ORISSA HIGH COURT
HIRANYA KUMAR SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) Nos.29964, 31255, 31519, 32321,

32371, 33958 & 34040 of 2023

In the matter of an application under Article 226 & 227 of

the Constitution of India, 1950.

………………

Hiranya Kumar Samal & …. Petitioners

Others -versus-

State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties

For Petitioner : Mr. Rajib Rath, Mr. S.S. Rath

& Mr. Y.M.S.Krishna, Advocate

For Opp. Parties : Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC

PRESENT:

THE HONBLE JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Date of Hearing: 17.10.2025 and Date of Judgment:28.11.2025

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Since the issue involved in these batch of Writ Petitions is identical, all the matters were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order. However, for the sake of convenience and brevity, W.P.(C) No.29964 of 2023 is taken as the lead case.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:-

“The petitioner therefore most respectfully prays that your lordships may be graciously pleased to admit this writ application and issue a Rule Nisi to the opposite parties to show cause as to why:-

i) the Opp. Parties shall not be direc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top