SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6660

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BIDYUTLATA SAMANTRAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.19669 of 2025

(An application under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950)

Bidyulata Samantray and another …. Petitioners

-versus-

State of Odisha and others …. Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioners - Ms. Deepali Mahapatra,

Advocate.

For Opposite Parties- Mr. G. Mohanty,

Learned Sanding Counsel

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.C.BEHERA

Date of Hearing :25.11.2025 :: Date of Judgment :25.11.2025

A.C. Behera, J. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners

under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950 praying for quashing of the impugned order dated 03.02.2020(Annexure-8) passed by the Additional Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar(Opposite Party No.5) in Revenue

Misc. Case No.161 of 2016.

2. The factual backgrounds of the writ petition, which prompted to the petitioners for filing of the same is that, rent of the case land was fixed by the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar in Revenue Misc. Case No.161 of 2016 as per order dated 16.07.2019 and on the basis of the fixation of rent of the case land by the Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar in Revenue Misc. Case No.161 of 2016, the RoR of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top