SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6702

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUMANTA KUMAR JENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.11045 of 2022

In the matter of an application under Article 226 &

227 of the Constitution of India, 1950.

………………

Sumanta Kumar Jena Petitioner

….

-versus-

State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties

For Petitioner: M/s. Dr. J.K. Lenka &

P.K. Behera, Adv.

For Opp. Parties: M/s. P.K. Panda

Addl.Standing Counsel

PRESENT:

THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing: 18.11.2025 and Date of Judgment: 18.11.2025

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.

2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.

3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:

The petitioner, therefore, most humbly prays that your Lordship would be graciously pleased to quash the punishment order dt.23.3.2019 at Annexure-11, appellate order dt.3.11.2020 at Annexure-13 and Revisional order at Annexure-15 and further be pleased to direct the Opp. parties to extend all benefits, as due to admissible by treating the suspension period as duty

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top