SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 6703

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BASUDEV AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) NO. 12747 OF 2004

In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the

Constitution of India.

Basudev Agarwal (dead) represented …. Petitioner

through LRs

-Versus-

State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties

Advocates appeared in this case:

For Petitioner : Mr. Budhadev Routray, Sr. Advocate with

M/s S. Routray, S. Sekhar, J. Biswal, S.

Swain & S. Dash, Advocates

Mr. Prafulla Kumar Rath, Sr. Advocate with M/s S. Rath, A. Behera, S.K. Behera, S. Das, S. Mohapatra, S. Chandan, I.P.

Bose & A. Biswal, Advocates

M/s. A.V. Bhat, A.R. Bharadwaj and

(Ms) M. Routray, Advocates

For Opp. Parties : Mr. U.C. Behura,

Addl. Government Advocate

with

Mr. J.K. Khandayatray, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD

J U D G M E N T

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of hearing & judgment : 18.11.2025 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PER DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD,J Essentially, Petitioner (now dead by LRs), seeks an order to OPs to allot encroached land that adjoins the land allotted to him in a normative way. Incidentally, he a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top