SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Ori) 596

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SUDHANSU SHEKHAR PATI – Appellant
Versus
SECURTIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA MUMBAI – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background of attachments and petitioner’s involvement. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioner’s arguments against the jurisdiction of sebi's actions. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court’s analysis on regulatory authority findings and judicial review limitations. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. discussion on the availability of an alternative remedy under sebi act. (Para 14 , 15)
5. court’s conclusion to decline the writ petition. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeeb K Panigrahi, J.

1. The petitioner in the present Writ Petition is challenging the order dated 24.09.2018 passed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India and the consequential attachment notices dated 13.04.2023 issued under Section 28A of the SEBI Act, 1992 read with the relevant provisions of the Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby the petitioner’s personal bank accounts as well as Demat and trading accounts have been attached.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. Succinctly put, the facts of the case are as follows:

(i) Seashore Securities Limited is a public company incorporated on 25.04.2008 and registered with the Registrar of Companies, Odisha.

(ii) Mr. Prashanta Kumar Dash is the promoter and Managing Director of Se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top