SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ori) 484

ORISSA HIGH COURT
STATE OF ODISHA – Appellant
Versus
AKSHAYA KUMAR BARIK – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WA No. 1303 of 2025 (An Appeal under Article-4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948, read with Clause-10 of the Letters Patent constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna and Rule-6 of Chapter-III of the Rules of the Hon’ble High Court of Orissa, 1948 challenging the order dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.28160 of 2020)

State of Odisha and Anr. …. Appellants Mr. Saroj Kumar Jee, A.G.A.

-versus-

Akshaya Kumar Barik & …. Respondents others Mr. Atul Tripathy, Advocate CORAM:

THE HON’BLE MR. DIXIT KRISHNA SHRIPAD THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH Date of Judgment: 19.01.2026 Chittaranjan Dash, J.

1. This Writ Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 29.10.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.28160 of 2020, whereby the order of the District Audit Officer, Local Fund Audit, Balasore, directing refixation of pay of the writ petitioner after retirement, was quashed and consequential directions were issued for restoration/reimbursement of any reduction effected in pensionary benefits. The Appellants–State have assailed the said judgment contending, inter alia, that the learned Single Jud

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top